NatureHaven
Laatst gezien: 14.11.26 9:09:16 AM
Status:
Volg
Cadeau’s 1
Over mij
Here's what I typed in chat before being blocked by Taanni. I was emotional and had a lot of fear that we wouldn't see another show. She said she didn't see the goal being reached, so it was good that I reminded her. She responded: "Thanks for saying that." I remember when -GubkaBob- responded to a goal being reached by mentioning "goal" in public chat, with an image. He's paying attention. He tips for goals.
Volgers
Reacties 79
14-11-26
In real life, I don't travel. It makes me feel homesick. I don't like traveling, and I'm scared of heights. I mind my own business and don't bother anyone. Social people move around a lot. I'm unsocial. On this website, I sound genuine, not nefarious. Indeed, I've been like this the whole time. Her translator was making errors. I was a prolific writer in psychology. It's normal for me to write this much. I initially slowed down, but she's focused on a perceived bad motive. So sad.
14-11-26
Taanni should speak to the chat regulars and ask them if I have a bad motive. It's just a tragedy that she has misunderstood me.☹️ I got along well with the chat regulars. There was rarely any conflict between us. Everything was going well. I just don't know why she's scared I must be some sort of nefarious person. It's not true. I'm the opposite of this. In real life, I don't socialize, and I don't bother people. I mind my business. I chatted a lot with _tiramisu_, there was no problem.
13-11-26
I have a screenshot of the PM. She overtly questioned my motive, through different insults. Why? It's strange. There's no bad motive. She thinks I was questioning her motive, but this isn't obvious. My comments appear benign and innocuous. Her comments directly assumed a bad motive. She said I'm a "hypocrite." The whole time, she was questioning my motive, but, sadly, she became hypersensitive when I mentioned a rule in the chat... O_o
13-11-26
I only watch one model. If I always talk about them, it's intimacy and not fanaticism, a diagnosis, or boredom. It's just a natural, authentic experience. If she doesn't like someone writing about her, she can ask them to stop. In my case, she didn't. I nicely asked her, too. She was angry about motive. She kept questioning my motive. At the end, she thought I was questioning her motive, but my comments didn't overtly indicate this. I just mentioned a rule that applies to models.
13-11-26
Intimacy isn't fanaticism. An intimate person connects with humans in a qualitative, not quantitative, way. This means they have fewer friends and stronger friendships. Their attention will be less divided amongst different people. It will be more centered on specific individuals. Their caring is deeper. They deeply care. Indeed, because their attention isn't divided. I only watch one model. It's because of how better they are than all the others I've seen. I dedicate my time to one.
13-11-26
Most of Taanni's followers don't believe she's a princess. They actually like many different models and aren't seeking out a princess. The opposite is true. You can learn this by observing the number of followings they have. It's rarely a low number. This is a minority of people. They're not fanatics. They're intimate, of course, something you don't normally see. This is informative research. I only followed her. This isn't fanaticism. It's intimacy. She's deeply mistaken.
13-11-26
My research doesn't have a bad motive. I'm confused why she thinks this. I asked her why, respectfully, and she thought my question was sarcasm and arguing, and she insulted me and assumed I have bad motives. It's just research, not a bad thing. I'm curious and open-minded. For example, someone could do research and determine the times where there's the most active tipping, so she could prioritize these times. I guess she only likes humor and doesn't want to hear any research?
13-11-26
Taanni said my "activity raises questions." O_o I'm confused. I'm just a researcher, not some sort of nefarious, fake person, but she has this impression. Research is good. I've been a researcher for years. It's real. And, when I tried to convince her otherwise, she think it's arguing. It's all strange. The chat regulars didn't have the impression there was a bad motive in my public chat activity. We got along. Yet, she thinks all my behavior has a bad motive. I was genuinely trying to help.
12-11-26
In PM, it's true that Taanni was abusive to me. In public chat, I was a decent man, to say the least. I told rude people to be polite to her. In one instance, ce_fute agreed with me. Her fans agreed with me. They did. They know I was decent. I didn't insult her. In PM, she quickly insulted me for the effort I put into the stream; she thinks it's fake. In another PM, she used profanity: "F*** off." Yes, she said this. The whole time, I was nice to her. She was too angry to be saved.
12-11-26
Her other stream is running smoothly. There used to be an issue, her approval rating used to be well below-average, but she has since greatly improved. It's now at 100%. If you remember, at the time, she was missing tip menu performances. This is now rarely an issue. The number recently reached 100%. Improvement is possible. She has done it before. It means better streams, more fun. In life, continuous improvement is a good mentality to have. It doesn't mean you don't support the model.
Bekijk meer reacties
